THE Acting Chairman of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission, Mr. Ibrahim Magu, on Tuesday, described Rivers and Lagos States as the headquarters of money laundering in Nigeria.
Magu said that though Lagos State was the first in terms of money laundering, the unenviable position was followed by Rivers.
The
acting EFCC chairman, who made these remarks while speaking with
newsmen in Port Harcourt, pointed out that the rate of money laundering
in Port Harcourt was high as a result of the oil business going on in
the city.
He said, “I think Rivers State is the next to
Lagos in terms of crime. This (Rivers) is the headquarters of money
laundering because there is a lot of oil money here.
“I think you
can rate Port Harcourt the second to maybe Lagos when you talk of
people playing with sinking, diving, hiding, maybe because of the large
space of oil deals.” Maintaining that the judgement halting
the EFCC from probing Rivers State governors will not stand, Magu
explained that the court order obtained by the former governor of the
state, Dr. Peter Odili, retraining the anti-graft agency from
investigating government officials in the state had been overtaken by
event.
He added that the commission would ensure that no stone was left unturned in exposing all criminal activities in Nigeria.
Magu
pointed out that unfolding events in the past had shown that not even
the court would stop the EFCC from performing its function of
investigating and prosecuting those alleged to be involved in financial
crimes.
He stated, “Nothing is going to stop us; even the issue
of the court order allegedly obtained by Dr Peter Odili and co to stop
the EFCC from investigation and prosecution has been overtaken by event.
“I
am telling you that, that judgement cannot stand; it will only take
some time. it cannot hold and we are going to conclude the
investigation. There are so many investigations we are doing.
“We
will take it before the court; let the court refuse to prosecute their
case. I am sure the matter has suffered for about 13 years now. we are
going to test it. The matter is in the Supreme Court, we will follow it
up.
“That decision that is pending in the Supreme Court does
not actually… cannot hold water again. There are subsequent judgements
that have discarded it. Clearly, there are other judgements that came up
and said nobody, not even the judge, not even the judiciary, not even
the court can stop us from investigating and prosecuting.”
He,
however, recalled that the anti-graft agency had been able to secure the
conviction of three former governors, adding that 1,245 convictions
were recorded in 2019.
No comments
Post a Comment