A Nigerian Lawyer and human rights activist, Johnmary
Jideobi, has instituted a suit in the Federal High Court in Abuja for
the enforcement of the fundamental human rights of the embattled Chief
Executive Officer (CEO) of Air Peace, Allen Onyema, who is facing fraud
allegations in the United States of America.
The Abuja based
legal practitioner in the suite no: FHC/ABJ/CS/1446/2019 filed on
Monday, and a copy obtained by PRNigeria, asked the court to bar the
Federal Government of Nigeria and Attorney General of the
Federation/Minister of Justice, Abubakar Malami, as well as other
agencies of government from harassing or extraditing Mr Onyema to the
U.S. against his will.
He sought seven-point reliefs including a
declaration by the court that the federal government and or any of its
agencies with prosecutorial powers as represented by Mr Malami who is
the respondent ” is/are without powers to abridge the fundamental right
of Onyema to freedom of movement as donated by Section 35 of the amended
1999 Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria”.
The
lawyer also wants the court to declare “that on the authority of Diamond
Bank PLC vs. Opara (2018) LPELR-43907(SC) the Federal Government of
Nigeria and or any of its agencies with prosecutorial powers as
represented by the Respondent herein cannot derogate from the
constitutional right to freedom of movement by attempting to forcefully
expel and or extradite Onyema from the shores of the Federal Republic of
Nigeria to any other country of the world for the purposes of any
criminal trial whose substance arose from underlying civil aviation
contracts”.
He also wants the court to declare that they “cannot
give effect to any extradition request from any country of the world in
so far as the ingredients or constituent facts of the indictment and or
charges underlying the said request are traceable to or related with or
arose from diverse civil aviation contracts entered into by Onyema
through his duly registered companies with other duly registered
companies in other jurisdictions especially in the United States of
America”.
Mr Jideobi also sought an order of the court to
perpetually bar “the Federal Government of Nigeria and or any of its
agencies with prosecutorial powers as represented by the Respondent
herein either by themselves, their servants, privies, assigns or any
other person or authority acting either in concert with them, on their
behalf or under them from giving effect to any extradition request from
any country of the world in so far as the ingredients or constituent
facts of the indictment and or charges underlying the said request are
traceable to or related with or arose from diverse civil aviation
contracts entered into by Onyema through his duly registered companies
with other duly registered companies in other jurisdictions especially
in the United States of America”.
He also sought a court order
perpetually barring the Federal Government of Nigeria and or any of its
agencies from attempting to or seeking to harass, threaten to arrest,
inviting and or arresting the applicant in relation with the civil
contract he mutually entered into through his duly registered companies
with other aviation companies especially in the United States of America
or anything connected thereto.
“The Applicant holds the clear
belief that the Constitution of Nigeria alongside the extant Fundamental
Rights Enforcement Procedure Rules, 2009 empowers him to initiate
proactive steps to “protect these highly cherished Fundamental Rights of
Onyema now that there is the likelihood that the Federal Government of
Nigeria through any of its prosecutorial agencies” may abridge these
rights.
According to him, the suit seeks to enforce the
beneficiary’s fundamental human rights to ward off their impending or
likely erosion by the Federal Government of Nigeria who may lend its
weight to the extradition request the Government of the United States of
America may present to it in alleged violation of the pronouncement of
the Supreme Court.
To this end, Mr Jideobi wants the court to
determine whether having regard to the provisions of Section 46 (1)
& (2) of the Nigerian Constitution, the fundamental rights of the
Air Peace boss to freedom of movement, protected by section 35 of the
Constitution, have not been endangered and exposed to erosion by the
facts and circumstances revealed in the U.S. charges.
No comments
Post a Comment