President Tribunal: INEC refuses to produce witnesses against Atiku, PDP

PDP and Atiku are challenging the outcome of the February 23 presidential election which INEC by its results, declared President Muhammadu Buhari and his All Progressives Congress, APC, as winner.
The tribunal had adjourned till July 29 for the first respondent, INEC, to open its defence.
But when the tribunal called INEC to open its case, the electoral umpire’s lawyer, Yunus Usman (SAN), affirmed before the tribunal that it would not be necessary on the grounds that the evidence extracted from the petitioners’ witnesses during cross-examination was in support of the commission’s case.
“We have also painstakingly studied the petitioners’ evidence under cross-examination, which supports our defence and our denial in consonance with our pleadings.
“My lords, we do not see the need to waste your lordship’s precious time by repeating what their witnesses have repeated under cross-examination.
“We, therefore, rely on the evidence of their witness under cross-examination.”
However, Buhari’s lawyer, Chief Wole Olanipekun (SAN), asked to be allowed to open his client’s case at 2:00 pm on Tuesday.
APC’s lawyer, Lateef Fagbemi (SAN) asserted that his decision on whether or not to call witnesses would depend on the case to be presented by Buhari’s legal team.
On his part, the petitioners’ lawyer, Dr. Livy Uzoukwu (SAN), thanked INEC’s legal team for not calling witnesses.
“I profusely thank my brother and friend for deciding not to call any witness,” he said.
But proceedings were adjourned till Tuesday for Buhari to open his defence.
No comments
Post a Comment