A Federal High Court sitting in Abuja
has refused an ex-parte application brought by the Attorney General of
the Federation (AGF) and Minister of Justice Abubakar Malami (SAN) to
stop the National Assembly from probing the reinstatement of the former
Chairman of the Presidential Task Force of Pension Reform, Abdulrasheed
Maina, into the civil service.
Justice Binta Murtala Nyako
reportedly heard the application in chambers, but turned it down and
ordered the applicant to put the respondents on notice, so as to come
and show cause why the application should not be granted.
The court later fixed January 15 for hearing of the motion on notice.
In
the suit, the AGF asked the court to determine if the National Assembly
has the right to probe issues relating to the “employment, attendance
at work, disengagement, reinstatement and or promotion of a civil
servant”.
He equally wants the court to among other things
declare that “the employment, attendance at work, disengagement,
reinstatement and or promotion of a civil servant are matters outside
the exclusive and concurrent legislative lists contained in the
Constitution of the Federal Republic of Nigeria 1999 (as amended)”.
Malami
also wants the court to declare that the National Assembly cannot
legitimately regulate the employment, attendance at work, disengagement,
reinstatement and or promotion of a civil servant, which are matters
exclusively within the purview of the Federal Civil Service Commission
under the Constitution.
He also prayed the court to declare that
the National Assembly lacks the legislative competence to investigate
the employment, attendance at work, disengagement, reinstatement and or
promotion of a civil servant, which are matters exclusively within the
purview of the Federal Civil Service Commission under the Constitution.
The
AGF submitted that the power of investigation vested in the National
Assembly by Section 88(1) of the Constitution is limited and such that
can only be exercised within the confines of Section 88(2) of the
Constitution.
According to him, the plaintiff as the Chief Law
Officer and Minister of Justice of the Federation is bound to ensure
compliance by the Federal Government of Nigeria and or any of its
cognate organs/agencies with the express or implied contents of extant
judgments and orders of competent courts in Nigeria.
He further
submitted that the National Assembly cannot constitute itself into a
quasi-appellate court, tribunal or panel with a view to reviewing any
executive action taken in compliance with the adverse judgment in the
said Suit No: FHC/ABJ/CS/65/2013.
Controversy has continued to
trail the reinstatement of Maina who had been on suspension over his
alleged involvement in the N100 billion fraud perpetrated by the pension
reform task force, which he headed up till 2013.
The AGF was
alleged to have masterminded the controversial reinstatement of Maina
into the civil service, even though he has denied the allegation.
Despite
clear evidence that his office wrote a letter to the Head of Civil
Service recommending Maina’s reinstatement, Malami denied having
knowledge of the letter.
The Senate had last October mandated its
Committees on Public Service, Internal Affairs, Anti-Corruption,
Establishment and Judiciary to probe the circumstances of Maina’s return
to the public service.
The House of Representatives had already commenced the probe.
When he appeared before the House panel, Malami denied involvement in Maina’s recall.
Despite
his alleged complicity in the pension fraud, abscondment from work and
becoming a fugitive of the law, Maina was recalled and deployed to the
Ministry of Interior under controversial circumstances.
Owing to
the uproar that followed his reinstatement, President Muhammadu Buhari
ordered Maina’s sack and queried the Head of Service of the Federation,
Winifred Oyo-Ita, to provide an explanation for Maina’s recall.
As a follow-up to that, the Senate moved to conduct a forensic investigation into the reinstatement.
0 Comments